I used to respect MCA. In its heyday it had good and credible  leaders  and was looked up to and well-respected.  But is it still  relevant  today?
Although MCA stands for Malaysian Chinese  Association, my  family members and relatives had never really felt  enough of a sense of  belonging to join or support the party.
Instead, to them DAP (Democratic Action Party) sounded much better although the word 'Chinese' is not in DAP's name.
Since   the dawn of time, MCA was, is and always will be the rich Chinese   businessman's party. Although it claims to champion Chinese causes, it   has never really been the voice of those Chinese who are poor and   downtrodden eventhough it has done good work for the cause of Chinese   education, for instance in getting recognition for TAR College which has   since been acknowledged and become known as UTAR. MCA has failed to   capture the soul of the poor and downtrodden Chinese.  In this aspect,   the other Chinese-based party, Gerakan has also failed miserably.
It   cannot be denied that DAP is a Chinese-based party as many of its   leaders and members are Chinese although there are top non-Chinese   leaders and members, namely Senator Tunku Abdul Aziz and Karpal Singh in   the present era. Currently too, there are a good number of Indian   leaders in Perak DAP who are Members of Parliament and State   Assemblymen. Well-known non-Chinese DAP leaders in the past were P.   Patto, V. David and Ahmad Nor.
Since the late 1960s to the   current era, DAP has always been known as the poor Chinese layman's   party, a great contrast to MCA being known as the rich Chinese   businessman's party.
DAP  leaders wearing their trademark short-sleeved white shirts and  black  trousers are still a symbol of the no-frills party since its  founding  date on 19 March 1966. It still champions the cause of the  poor to this  very day and recently the party has embarked on an ongoing  signature  campaign to protest against the constant price hikes of  petrol and daily  foodstuffs which are burdening the poor and the  low-income group.
DAP  has always been credible and relevant to  the Chinese.  Even when it has  little support, especially in the 11th  General Election in 2004, it  still managed to soldier on. Its leaders  have fought on relentlessly for  the cause of justice for all races, not  just the Chinese alone. A case  in point is A. Sivanesan (currently  State Assemblyman of Sungkai) who  has been fighting for minimum wage  since 1985! That's more than a  quarter of a century! Another example is  Lim Guan Eng who had to endure a  prison term for fighting for the  rights of a girl, a Malay, who was a  victim of statutory rape.
No  way is DAP anti-Islam or  anti-Malay! The facts speak for itself. That  sort of accusation is done  with malicious intent. No sane person should  ever believe such blatant  lies.
In regards to MCA, this once  great Chinese party has now  degenerated into a small fry, ever-fearful  of UMNO, its big brother in  Barisan Nasional. It dares not speak out  against UMNO and only knows how  to parrot UMNO's words.
The Chinese in Lim Kit Siang's blog refer to MCA leaders as 'running   dogs'. 'Running dogs' is a derogatory term used to refer to the Chinese   in Malaya during World War II who betrayed their fellow-Chinese to the   Japanese forces. In its current usage, it simply means that the MCA   leaders are traitors to their race.  There are worst names being used to   label the MCA leaders but which are not printable here.
The   Transport Ministry headed by a MCA minister has allowed the Port Klang   Free Zone (PKFZ) issue to sink to the bottom of the ocean while the   Tourism Ministry which is also headed by a MCA minister has allowed all   sorts of shenanigans to go on.
Yes, MCA is no longer credible.    And no longer relevant to the Chinese except to the rich Chinese   businessmen and its cronies whom it looks after very well in exchange   for their patronage.
On the other hand, DAP continues to be a   beacon of hope to the people like a campfire in the night (which happens   to be the symbol of its founding date in the Chinese almanac).  In the   night when it is dark and cold, many people need the campfire and  crowd  round it for warmth and sustenance (cooking food).
Yes, DAP has and will always have an important role as the voice of the poor and the oppressed in the Malaysian political scene. DAP is where the action is, now more so than ever in this era of the new political landscape post-March 2008.
[Source: Harakahdaily]
 
 Malott (left),  a frequent critic of the government since ending his three-year tenure  as US ambassador in 1998, told Najib to take “a long look in the mirror”  if he was serious about achieving his 1Malaysia goal.
Malott (left),  a frequent critic of the government since ending his three-year tenure  as US ambassador in 1998, told Najib to take “a long look in the mirror”  if he was serious about achieving his 1Malaysia goal. Other examples of insensitivities, said Malott, included Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussien
Other examples of insensitivities, said Malott, included Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussien  Malott  said that while Najib may not actually believe the rhetoric emanating  from his party and his government's officers, he allows it because he  needs to shore up Malay votes.
Malott  said that while Najib may not actually believe the rhetoric emanating  from his party and his government's officers, he allows it because he  needs to shore up Malay votes.